Posts by: jsndavis

Ninth Circuit Ruling: Background Checks for Ammo Unconstitutional

Ninth Circuit Ruling: Background Checks for Ammo Unconstitutional

Case Overview Rhode v. Bonta is a federal lawsuit challenging the constitutionality of California’s ammunition sales restrictions, specifically the background check requirements established under Proposition 63 (2016) and subsequent legislative amendments. The plaintiffs, including Olympic gold medalist shooter Kim Rhode, the California Rifle & Pistol Association (CRPA), and several ammunition vendors, argued that these laws violated the Second Amendment, the…read more →

24 Jul, 2025
California’s Microstamping Mandate: Technological Promise or Practical Pitfall?

California’s Microstamping Mandate: Technological Promise or Practical Pitfall?

In a move poised to reshape firearm regulations, California’s Department of Justice (DOJ) released its long-awaited Microstamping Technological Viability Report on July 18, 2025. The report, mandated by recent amendments to the state’s Penal Code, concludes that microstamping—a technology designed to imprint unique identifiers from a firearm onto spent cartridge casings—is technologically viable for semiautomatic handguns.oag.ca.gov This finding paves the…read more →

24 Jul, 2025
The Davis Law Firm Secures Victory in Siskiyou County CCW Appeal

The Davis Law Firm Secures Victory in Siskiyou County CCW Appeal

The Davis Law Firm is proud to announce a recent victory in a concealed carry weapon (CCW) license appeal against the Siskiyou County Sheriff’s Office. This case highlights our firm’s dedication to defending the rights of our clients and ensuring that the law is applied correctly under California’s evolving firearm regulations. Case Background Our client applied for a CCW license…read more →

23 Jul, 2025
DOJ Issues Notice of Proposed Rule Making for Application for Relief from Federal Firearms Disabilities

DOJ Issues Notice of Proposed Rule Making for Application for Relief from Federal Firearms Disabilities

Overview The Department of Justice (DOJ) proposes amendments to 28 CFR Part 25 and the addition of a new 28 CFR Part 107 to implement 18 U.S.C. 925(c), enabling individuals prohibited from possessing firearms under 18 U.S.C. 922(g) to apply for relief from federal firearms disabilities. The rule balances Second Amendment rights, as reinforced by Supreme Court decisions (District of…read more →

22 Jul, 2025
Reporting Lost or Stolen Firearms in California: What You Need to Know

Reporting Lost or Stolen Firearms in California: What You Need to Know

Owning a firearm in California comes with significant responsibilities, including compliance with state and local laws regarding the reporting of lost or stolen firearms. Failure to adhere to these regulations can result in penalties and legal complications. At The Davis Law Firm, we are committed to helping California gun owners navigate these complex laws. This article outlines the key requirements…read more →

21 Jul, 2025
Summary of California Ammunition-Only Vendor Laws

Summary of California Ammunition-Only Vendor Laws

Overview Ammunition-only vendors in California, who are not licensed firearms dealers, are subject to strict regulations under the California Penal Code, particularly within Articles 2, 3, 4, and 5 of Chapter 1, Division 10, Title 4, Part 6. These laws govern the licensing, sale, and record-keeping requirements for vendors selling more than 500 rounds of ammunition in any 30-day period….read more →

18 Jul, 2025

California Firearms Dealer Signage and Display Requirements: A Comprehensive Guide

Introduction Licensed firearms dealers in California must comply with specific signage and display requirements under the California Penal Code to promote public safety and regulatory adherence. These requirements include displaying the dealer’s license and posting three mandatory signs that inform customers about legal obligations, safety protocols, and operational policies related to firearm sales and transfers. As of May 2025, state…read more →

16 Jul, 2025

Understanding 18 U.S.C. § 925A: Remedy for Erroneous Firearm Denial

Introduction In the United States, the right to bear arms is protected under the Second Amendment, but it comes with regulations (whether valid under the Constitution or not) that purportedly ensure public safety. The National Instant Criminal Background Check System (NICS), established under the Brady Handgun Violence Prevention Act, is a critical tool used to prevent prohibited individuals from purchasing…read more →

14 Jul, 2025
Why You Need a Firearms Attorney in California: Trust The Davis Law Firm to Navigate the Legal Chaos

Why You Need a Firearms Attorney in California: Trust The Davis Law Firm to Navigate the Legal Chaos

California’s firearms laws are a legal quagmire, so convoluted that even judges find them “impenetrable.” In Rash v. Lungren (1997), Appeals Court Justice Bedsworth described a related statute as “hard” to read, “arduous” to write about, and “probably downright painful” to understand (59 Cal.App.4th 1233). Former Attorney General Dan Lungren likened these laws to the state’s Byzantine tax code, while…read more →

11 Jul, 2025
Firearm Use in Self-Defense: California and Federal Law

Firearm Use in Self-Defense: California and Federal Law

This article outlines the legal framework for drawing or using a firearm in self-defense under California and federal law, focusing on verified statutes and case law. For legal advice, contact The Davis Law Firm, experienced in California firearms law. I. California Law on Firearm Use in Self-Defense California law permits the use of firearms in self-defense under strict conditions, governed…read more →

9 Jul, 2025
‹12345678›»