Posted on April 8, 2025 by Jason Davis The California Department of Justice (CA DOJ) is under fire—and rightfully so. Today, The Davis Law Firm issued a formal legal demand to Attorney General Rob Bonta, calling out the CA DOJ’s blatant non-compliance with federal law governing firearm background checks. As a “Point of Contact” (POC) state under the National Instant…read more →
30 yrs of 2A rights stripped from the rehabilitated—vets, workers, and citizens. DOJ’s new rule could fix it, but will it? Read this fiery letter from CA firearm rights lawyers Jason Davis @calgunlawyers and Don Kilmer @donkilmer exposing the crisis & demanding a real fix. #2ndAmendment #Justice Analysis of the Letter The letter from Jason Davis and Donald E.J. Kilmer,…read more →
Key Points Case Overview In the case of Andre Nesbit v. FF Firearms, Nesbit claimed FF Firearms committed fraud by misrepresenting the firearm pickup period and refusing a refund. The trial court dismissed the claim for lacking detail, and the court of appeals affirmed this decision on February 11, 2025, noting Nesbit failed to specify who made the misrepresentations and…read more →
The Davis Law Firm attorney Jason Davis has been a key figure in defending the rights of firearm businesses. Recently, Davis, along with the fantastic attorneys at Wiley Law played a crucial role in a landmark case involving Franklin Armory, challenging the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives (ATF) over regulatory overreach. The Case The lawsuit, Firearms Regulatory Accountability…read more →
Restoring Firearm Rights in California: A New Chapter Begins in 2025 For Californians stripped of their firearm rights—whether due to a felony, domestic violence conviction, or mental health prohibition—hope has been hard to come by. Federal law under 18 U.S.C. 925(c) promises a path to restore those rights, but for over 30 years, the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and…read more →
Every once in a while, I stumble across a case that has what I believe to be a fascinating fact pattern, but they usually do not fall within the realm of firearm laws. And when they do, they usually do not land in favor of the firearm owner. Today, however, I found the case of Murchison v. Cnty. of Tehama,…read more →
It’s that time of year again! The NRA Board of Directors election is just around the corner. As in the past, The Davis Law Firm is enthusiastically endorsing Graham Hill for the NRA Board of Directors. Having worked with him on the board of the Fifty Caliber Institute, I can honestly say that he is driven to support the Second…read more →
Davis & Associates, once again, is enthusiastically endorsing Graham Hill for the NRA Board of Directors. Having worked with him on the board of the Fifty Caliber Institute, I can honestly say that he is driven to support the Second Amendment to the fullest. Born and raised in South Texas, Graham Hill grew up shooting and hunting with his father…read more →
Sometimes, being vindicated takes time, risk, and provocation. Such is the case with Mindy Costa, who’s actions in fighting vexatious laws quietly liberated the residential gun owners of Torrance and those transporting firearms through the city from a little known municipal code that made most firearm owners within the city and those traveling through the city with firearms potential misdemeanants –…read more →
UPDATE JANUARY 12, 2015: More Waiting Ahead!!!!! Today the Ninth Circuit issued an order staying the District Court’s ruling that struck the 10 day waiting period for most firearm purchasers. The Ninth Circuit’s ruling was brief: “Appellant’s motion to stay the district court’s August 25, 2014 order pending appeal is granted. See Hilton v. Braunskill, 481 U.S. 770, 776 (1987).”…read more →