Overview of California Bill AB 165 California Assembly Bill 165, effective January 1, 2022, allows individuals to request a copy of their criminal history record from the California Department of Justice (DOJ) through the Personal Firearms Eligibility Check (PFEC) program, as outlined in California Penal Code section 30105. This law enables you to verify your eligibility to purchase or possess…read more →
Shooting ranges, whether indoor or outdoor, provide a unique environment for firearms enthusiasts, law enforcement personnel, and recreational shooters to practice and hone their skills. However, operating a shooting range comes with significant legal and financial risks due to the inherent dangers of firearms. From accidental injuries to property damage, the potential liabilities are substantial. To mitigate these risks, shooting…read more →
Introduction When a firearm is seized by law enforcement in California, retrieving it can be a complex process governed by specific state laws. California has established clear procedures for the return of firearms, but challenges often arise due to local agency policies or misunderstandings of the law. This article provides a step-by-step guide to the law enforcement gun return process,…read more →
Introduction Transferring a firearm between immediate family members in California, known as an intrafamilial firearm transaction, is governed by strict state laws to ensure safety and legality. This article provides a step-by-step guide to completing an intrafamilial transfer, defines the process using statutory language, distinguishes it from operation of law transfers, and explains how The Davis Law Firm can assist…read more →
Introduction Inheriting a firearm in California is a process governed by strict state laws, requiring careful compliance to ensure legality and safety. This article provides a step-by-step guide to transferring a firearm through inheritance, an operation of law transfer, and clarifies the distinction between operation of law transfers and intrafamilial transfers. It also highlights how The Davis Law Firm, led…read more →
On August 21, 2024, a petition for certiorari was filed with the U.S. Supreme Court in Snope v. Brown (No. 24-203), challenging the Fourth Circuit’s en banc decision in Bianchi v. Brown, 111 F.4th 438 (4th Cir. 2024), which upheld Maryland’s assault weapons ban. This case emerges in the wake of Duncan v. Bonta (9th Cir. 2025), where the Ninth…read more →
Miller v. Bonta: Status and Details
In Duncan v. Bonta (2025), the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals, sitting en banc, upheld California’s ban on large-capacity magazines (LCMs), reversing a district court’s ruling that the law violated the Second Amendment. The case, brought by plaintiffs including Virginia Duncan and the California Rifle & Pistol Association, challenged California Penal Code § 32310(c), which prohibits possession of magazines holding…read more →
California Department of Justice – Bureau of Firearms Audit Reports Released The Davis Law Firm has obtained the final reports on audits of the California Department of Justice – Bureau of Firearms and their compliance with the Point of Contact requirements. California’s history as a NICS POC state reflects a generally strong compliance record, with audits from 2008 to 2017…read more →
Posted on April 8, 2025 by Jason Davis The California Department of Justice (CA DOJ) is under fire—and rightfully so. Today, The Davis Law Firm issued a formal legal demand to Attorney General Rob Bonta, calling out the CA DOJ’s blatant non-compliance with federal law governing firearm background checks. As a “Point of Contact” (POC) state under the National Instant…read more →